SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 418

M.S.SHAH
VISHNUPRASAD C. DARJI – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.C.DAVE, D.PANDEY, MANISHA LAV KUMAR SHAH, P.K.JANIKIRAN, P.V.Hathi, S.N.SHELAT

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, two Private Secretaries (English Stenographer Grade-I) Class II on the establishment of this Court have challenged the communication dated 6. 9. 1993 (Annexure "f" colly.) from the Deputy Registrar, on behalf of the High Court of Gujarat to the petitioners rejecting their application for grant of higher grade scale. The communication states that the Deputy Registrar was directed to state that the petitioners cannot be granted higher grade scale with effect from 1. 8. 1993 as it is not admissible under the Rules and hence the petitioners applications were not entertained.

( 2 ) PETITIONER No. 1 was appointed as a Section Writer in the Small Causes Court and worked as such between 1. 8. 1978 and 17. 1. 1980. Thereafter, he came to be appointed as Stenographer Grade III with effect from 18. 1. 1980 in the District Court, Baroda where he worked as such till 31. 5. 1980. Petitioner No. 1 was thereafter appointed as Stenographer Grade II with effect from 1. 6. 1980 in the same Court and continued to work on the said post till 31. 7. 1984. By order dated 17. 7. 1984, petitioner No. 1 came to be appointed as Person















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top