SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 755

S.K.KESHOTE
MINESH RAJNIKANT DALAL – Appellant
Versus
AVANI MINESH DALAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: N.A.PANDYA, Y.F.MEHTA

S. K. KESHOTE, J.

( 1 ) ALL these three arise from Hindu Marriage Petition No. 280 of 1995 in the court of 5th Extra Assistant Judge, Vadodara, and the same are being taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) CIVIL Revision Application No. 1469 of 1996 is directed by the husband against the order of the court below, ex. 8 dated 21/08/1996, under which the court has directed the petitioner-husband to pay the respondent-wife, interim alimony at the rate of Rs. 2,000/= p. m. from the date of filing of the petition, i. e. 28. 12. 95 till the final disposal of the main petition. The court below further ordered the petitioner-husband to pay Rs. 5,000/= to the respondent-wife towards expenses for contesting the petition.

( 3 ) CIVIL Revision Application No. 1631 of 1996 is filed by wife against this very order for enhancement of the amount of interim alimony as well as the amount of litigation expenses.

( 4 ) IN Misc. Civil Application No. 118 of 1999, the wife is praying for transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 280 of 1995 from the Court of 5th Extra Assistant Judge, Vadodara, to City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, and further prayer has been made for






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top