( 1 ) THIS revision application is directed by the defendant- petitioner against the order of the Civil Judge, Una dated 24-6-1999 in Regular Civil Suit No 89 of 1996 below Exh 148.

( 2 ) IT is really shocking and surprising that the members of the Bar in the court have little care of the matters which are to be presented Not only this even they do not bother to read the papers, before same are to be presented in the Court It is a duty of the members of the Bar to present each and every paper after they themselves read it, so that there may be any chance of errors, omissions and mistakes Sometimes, very glaring mistakes are being noticed in the Memo of the revisions, appeals and applications etc This is a case where i find glaring mistake in the memo of revision application The order is dated 24-6-1999 which is impugned in this revision application is passed in favour of the plaintiff-respondent No 1 The application filed by the plaintiff-respondent no. l for change of her power of Attorney holder and to record his statement was came to be granted under this order, but contrary to it what the petitioner states that as if this application has been filed by the petit