Gujarat High Court
Judgename :B.C.PATEL, D.M.Dharmadhikari
HIRALAL BHAGWATI - Appellant
Versus
COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent
S.C.A.1820 of 1989
Decided On : 04/18/2000
(b) Income Tax Act, 1961 (Central Act 43 of 1961) - Secs. 148 & 271(1)(a)(c) & 274 (2)(f) - Re-opening of assessment - Notices issued for income which escaped assessment - Held, authority issuing notices under Sec. 148 are under duty to file affidavit and place necessary material on before the Court.
(c) Income Tax Act, 1961 (Central Act 43 of 1961) - Secs. 80-G (5) and 12-A (a) - Exemption - Application under Sec. 12-A (a) registered by Commissioner of Income Tax - Income Tax Officer issued notices under Sec. 148 in view of the object of Trust Constitution - Held, once registration is recognized under Sec. 12-A (a) the benefit of Secs. 80-G (5) cannot be denied - Object of serving a section of people is of general public utility - Notices served under Sec. 148 of Income Tax read with Secs. 271 (1) (a), 271 (1)(c) and 273(2)(b) quashed and set aside, respondent directed to decide the case in accordance with law for exemption under Sec. 80-G (5).
In Courts opinion, looking to the scheme of the Trust, which is produced on the record, it is clear that the same is intended to benefit a section of the public, which certainly can be distinguished. The persons who are entitled to get the benefit should be identifiable. In the instant case, the Trust is created under a Trust Deed dated 21st July, 1981.
[Para 15]
It is also required to be noted that once the registration under Sec. 12 A (a) of the Act is granted, the grant of benefit cannot be denied. The I.T.O. was not justified in refusing the benefits which would otherwise accrue under the Registration. If there was no registration, as contemplated under Sec. 12 A (a) read with Rule 17 A, the Revenue would have been justified in making a submission that the benefit cannot be granted, but where the application for registration is submitted and the registration has been granted, the benefit cannot be denied on the ground that the scheme is not for the benefit of public at large.
[Para 15]
Court allows this petitions and held quashes and sets aside an order rejecting the application for exemption under Sec. 80 G (5) of the Act, with a direction to decide the same in accordance with law. The proceedings initiated under Sec. 148 of the Income Tax Act against the assesse for the assessment year 1984-85 and the notices issued under Secs. 271 (1) (a), 271 (1) (c) and 273 (2) (b) for the assessment year 1985-86 are hereby quashed and set aside.
[Para 22]
( 1 ) ). THIS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the Trustees of the Gujarat Law Society Karmachari Kalyan Nidhi, Ahmedabad.
( 2 ) THE short facts leading to the present proceedings are as under :- respondent-Commissioner of Income Tax (hereinafter referred to as "c. I. T. ") considered the application dated 21. 7. 1981 of the Gujarat Law Society Karmachari Kalyan Nidhi (hereinafter referred to as "the Trust") submitted under Section 12a (a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), and vide letter dated 21. 4. 1982 (Annexure `e) informed the said trust that the same has been registered under Section 12a (a) of the Act. For the assessment year 1985-86, the Trust was denied the exemption and benefit under Section 80g (5) of the Act by an order dated 10. 2. 1989 by the Income Tax Officer (hereinafter referred to as "i. T. O. " ). Notices dated 10. 2. 1989 were issued by the I. T. O. under Section 148 of the Act for the assessment year 1984-85, and under Section 274 read with Sections 273 (2) (b), 271 (1) (a) and 271 (1) (c) of the Act for the assessment year 1985-86. Respondents, though served, have filed no reply and, therefore, uncontroverted averments made in the petition are required to be accepted.
( 3 ) THE Trust was settled by Petitioner No. 2 by executing a Deed of Trust dated 21st July, 1981, vide Annexure `b. The Rules and Regulations of the Trust framed by the settler and the Trustees on 21st July, 1981 are at Annexure `c. The Trust was registered as a Public Charitable Trust with the Office of the Charity Commissioner under the provisions contained in the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, vide registration No. CH/4648/ahmedabad, for which a certificate of registration was issued on 28th January, 1982, vide Annexure `d. The petitioners submitted an application on 9. 3. 1982 for being registered under Section 12a (a) of the Act, which was entered at No. G. 137/iv in the Register of Applications under Section 12a (a) maintained by the C. I. T. after making all necessary enquiries whether the Trust is a Public Charitable Trust or not. The letter issued by the C. I. T. on 21st April, 1982 in response to the application dated 9. 3. 1982 for the aforesaid purpose is placed on record vide Annexure `e. It is in view of the registration Annexure `e, the petitioners addressed a letter dated 17. 2. 1988 vide Annexure `f with relevant record to the concerned I. T. O. for being recognized under Section 80g of the Act so that the Trust can avail of the benefit of exemption under Section 80g of the Act. It is in response to this application the concerned I. T. O. , vide letter dated 26. 2. 1988, Annexure `g, communicated that "the object of the Trust is to help by giving financial aid to the employees of the Gujarat Law Society, in cases of death of an employee during his / her services, illness or permanent disability which incapacitates the employee to discharge his / her duties", and held that the objects of the Trust are not for general public utility and hence, the Trust is not entitled to get exemption under Section 80g of the Act.
( 4 ) ON or about 10. 2. 1989, respondent No. 2 made an Assessment Order for the assessment year 1985-86, and held that from the object of the petitioner-Trust, it is clear that the benefits are limited to its members only, who cannot be termed as "members of the public", and ultimately, held that the Trust is liable for the tax and computed the total income of the Trust at Rs. 23,633. 00, vide Annexure `j on 10. 2. 1989. Notice was issued under Section 148 of the Act, vide Annexure `k and notices were also issued to show cause, why penalty should not be imposed, under Section 274, read with Sections 273 (2) (b), 271 (1) (a) and 271 (1) (c) of the Act, vide Annexure `l Collectively.
( 5 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners submitted that so far as notice under Section 148 of the Act is concerned, the respondents have filed no
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.