SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 645

J.R.VORA, K.R.VYAS
GOPALBHAI OGHADBHAI PAREKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: JIVANLAL G.SHAH, S.P.DAVE

K. R. VYAS, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant- Gopalbhai Parekh, serving as an Extension Officer of Bhachau Taluka Panchayat at the relevant time was charged for the offences punishable under section 161 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 5 (1) (d) and 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,1947 (old Act) by the learned Special Judge, Kutch at Bhuj for accepting illegal gratification of Rs. 150/from the complainant. The original - accused no. 2 Khoda Ranchhod Ayer was charged for the offence punishable under section 165-A of the Indian Penal Code for abetting the accused no. 1. At the end of the trial, the learned judge, by his judgment and order dated 4th November 1987 passed in Special Case No. 2 of 1985, convicted the accused no. 1 for offence punishable under section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to suffer R. I. for one year and a fine of Rs. 500. 00, in default, to undergo S. I. for six months. The said accused was also convicted for offence punishable under section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer R. I. for one year. The learned judge ordered both the sentences to run concurrently. The accused no. 2 was, however, acquitted of t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top