SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 724

D.C.SRIVASTAVA, H.K.RATHOD
ASHWINKUMAR MANILAL SHAH – Appellant
Versus
CHHOTABHAI JETHABHAI PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: JITENDRA M.PATEL, Y.N.OZA

D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THE above-mentioned First Appeal and the two civil applications are proposed to be disposed by a common judgement and order. The First Appeal has been filed against the judgement and decree dated 2. 12. 1987 of Civil Judge (S. D.), Vadodara, dismissing the suit of the plaintiff-appellant for specific performance of agreement to sell, executed by the defendants nos. 1 and 2 on 1. 2. 1979. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are as under:-

( 2 ) ON 1. 2. 1979 the defendants nos. 1 and 2 along with the defendants nos. 3 to 8 executed an agreement to sell the land belonging to exclusive ownership, possession and enjoyment of the defendants. The area of the land agreed to be sold was 37,371 sq. ft. of Survey No. 17/2, which is wrongly mentioned in the plaint as Survey No. 10/2 of village Manjalpura, District Vadodara, at the rate of Rs. 5. 81 per sq. ft. A sum of Rs. 10,001 was paid as earnest money to the defendants. The boundaries of the land to be sold are given in paragraph 1 of the plaint. The defendants nos. 1 and 2 at the time of execution of agreement to sell gave assurance that they have right to sell on behalf of the defendants nos. 3 to 8 and t




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top