H.H.MEHTA
NAVINCHANDRA DHARMASHIBHAI DOSHI – Appellant
Versus
NATVARLAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE original accused No. 2 of Criminal Case No. 1106/97 which is still pending on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 16, Ahmedabad (for short `the learned Magistrate) has by filing this Criminal Revision Application under Sec. 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenged correctness, legality and propriety of judgment Exh. 14 dated 15th September, 1999, rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 13, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad (for short `the learned Judge of the Revisional Court) in Criminal Revision Application No. 148/99.
( 2 ) HERE in this Criminal Revision Application, the Revision-Petitioner is an original accused No. 2 while revision opponents No. 1 and 2 are complainant and accused No. 1 respectively. For the sake of convenience, parties will be referred to hereinafter as `complainant and `accused No. 1 and 2 respectively at appropriate places.
( 3 ) THE facts leading to this Criminal Revision Application in a nutshell are as follows:3. 1 on or about 5th April, 1997, the complainant lodged his private complaint against both the accused i. e. accused No. 1 and 2 for an offence punishable under Sec. 138 of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.