SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 129

C.K.THAKKER
MAHENDRAKUMAR VEERABHAI MAKWANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.Padival, P.M.THAKKAR, R.M.DOSHIT

C. K. THAKKER, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed by the petitioner against the order dt. 26/02/1986 passed by the Commander, State Reserve Police (SRP) force, Group-XII, Gandhinagar, respondent No. 2 herein terminating his services.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner is that after he was duly selected, he was appointed as Carpenter by an order dt. 14/05/1984 with effect from that date in the pay scale of Rs. 350-560. The said appointment was purely on temporary basis. He was posted at Nadiad. It is the case of the petitioner that even though his services were satisfactory, by the impugned order dt. 26/02/1986 his services came to be terminated with effect from 30 days from that date. It is the contention of the petitioner that the said order is not an order of termination simpliciter, but by way of penalty and punishment. Since it is punitive in nature, the said action can be taken in consonance with the principles of natural justice by issuing notice, calling for explanation and affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Since it is not done, the impugned order requires to be quashed and set aside.

( 3 ) MISS Doshit appearing for the respondents contended that t






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top