SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 956

RAVI R.TRIPATHI
UMA SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.N.RAVAL, Y.N.OZA

RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) THE matter is being adjourned from time to time starting from 16. 6. 2000. At one stage, i. e. on 4. 8. 2000, it was given out by Mr. Y. N. Oza that he would like to file a Civil Application for bringing necessary amendment; then the matter was adjourned to 18. 8. 2000. Time was sought on behalf of Mr. Oza on 18. 8. 2000, whereupon as a last opportunity, the matter was adjourned to 25. 8. 2000. On 15. 9. 2000, arguments were heard in part, at which stage learned Assistant Govt. Pleader sought time to get instructions. Again on 17. 11. 2000, it was mentioned on behalf of learned advocate for the petitioner that it was not convenient for him to go on with the matter on that day. With consent, it was adjourned to 1. 12. 2000.

( 2 ) TODAY, when the matter is called out it is given out that a letter was addressed to the present President of Uma Small Scale Industrial Cooperative Society Limited on 2. 9. 2000, a xerox copy of which is produced which is taken on record. It is also given out that learned advocate for the petitioner has not received any instructions. For want of instructions it is not possible for learned advocate for the petitioner to go on with t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top