SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 239

D.P.BUCH
BHIKHABHAI RANCHHODBHAI MAKWANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.G.SHETH, SHAKIL A.QURESHI

D. P. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-original complainant has preferred this revision application under section 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 challenging the judgment and acquittal order dated 30. 8. 2000 recorded by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge of the City Sessions Court, Court No. 15, Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No. 59/99 under which the learned Addl. Sessions Judge allowed the said appeal of contesting respondent no. 2 herein and set aside the judgment and conviction order recorded by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in Criminal Case No. 2058/97 and directed that the fine be refunded to respondent no. 2 herein. The present petitioner had filed criminal case no. 2058/97 on 7. 10. 1997 against respondent no. 2 herein for offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (for short, the Act) After registering the complaint and after hearing the evidence, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate found that the second respondent herein was acquitted of offence punishable under Section 138 of the said Act and consequently after hearing him on the point of quantum of punishment, the learned Magistrate, court No. 10 convicted the second respondent f









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top