SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 334

J.N.BHATT
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
ISHWARLAL KHUMCHAND SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ADIL MEHTA, DIPAK K.TRIVEDI

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) IN this group of 11 acquittal appeals common questions are involved accused is common and the evidence is also virtually common Therefore upon the request and considering the facts and circumstances the entire group is being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THE respondent is the original accused person. against whom 11 complaints were filed by complainant Shri Shirishchandra Fakirchand Shah before the Billimora Police alleging that the accused was in charge of writing of accounts financial matters and administration of the partnership firm run in the name of M/s. Fakirchand Bhikhabhai and Sons of Billimora during the period from January 1981 till the dale of complaint.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the prosecution case the complainant and one Shri Nitinchandra Fakirchand Shah were the partners of the aforesaid registered partnership firm having its office at Billimora. The firm was dealing in building materials and motor car spare parts at Billimora. The accused Mr. I. K. Shah was engaged by the firm since 19 with a monthly salary of Rs. 250/- and he was working as an Accountant-cum-Cashier of the firm.

( 4 ) THE complainant alleged that the accused who was an A



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top