( 1 ) ORIGINAL accused Nos. 1 and 2 have preferred this appeal against the order of conviction recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar, on 05. 08. 1996, in Sessions Case No. 9 of 1995. By the said order, accused No. 1 was held guilty for an offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ("ndps Act" for short) and for an offence punishable under Section 22 of the NDPS Act. Accused No. 2 was held guilty for an offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) of the NDPS Act. The Trial Court sentenced accused No. 1 to undergo R. I. for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1 lakh (in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for five years) for the offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) of the NDPS Act and rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and a fine of Rs. 1 lakh (in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for five years) for the offence punishable under Section 22 of the NDPS Act. The Trial Court directed that both the sentences shall run concurrently. So far as accused No. 2 is concerned, the Trial Court sentenced him to undergo 10 years rigorous imp