SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 648

P.B.MAJMUDAR
BHARATKUMAR GAJANAND VYAS – Appellant
Versus
MAHATMA GANDHI LABOUR INSTITUTE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.YAGNIK, Tanna Associates

P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) MAHATMA Gandhi Labour Institute, Ahmedabad, respondent No. 1, has suspended the present petitioner on the ground that the petitioner went on hunger strike on 2nd October, 2000 by sitting at the front entrance of the institution as well as on the ground that he had refused to drive the vehicle of the Institution on 11. 10. 2000 on the ground that unless he was provided with Log Book, he will not drive the vehicle. On the aforesaid two grounds, the petitioner is placed under suspension since 13th August, 2000.

( 2 ) THE present petitioner is serving as a driver in the respondent No. 1-Institution and he is a Class III employee of the said Institution. He is serving since last 16 years on the said post. The petitioner used to drive the vehicle attached to Mr. S. Chandrasekhar, the Director General of the Institution. in the past, the petitioner had addressed certain representations in connection with certain demands. One of such representations is annexed at page 20, Annexure `b, which is addressed to the Chairman of the respondent No. 1-Institution. The Labour Minister is the Chairman of the said Institution. In the said representation, the petitioner has poin


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top