SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 713

D.A.MEHTA, M.U.SHAH
KALINDI INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.B.NAIK, MANISH R.BHATT, R.K.PATEL

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference at the instance of the assessee, following questions have been referred by the Tribunal for our opinion in respect of assessment year 1975-76:- (I) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the disallowance of short term capital loss amounting to Rs. 1,24,545. 00 arising out of loss incurred on account of sale of shares in question to M/s. Ambernath Investments Pvt. Ltd. which was a wholly owned subsidiary company of M/s. Kaveri Investments Pvt. Ltd. , which, in its turn was a wholly owned subsidiary company of the assessee company ? (II) Whether the Tribunal was justified in interpreting various relevant provisions of various Acts such as Section 45, 47 (iv) (a), 2 (17), 2 (26) of the I. T. Act as well as section 4 etc. of the Companies Act, 1956, while arriving at the conclusion that the loss in question was incurred on account of transaction between the parent company and the subsidiary company and hence the same was disallowable u/s. 47 (iv) (a) of the Act in spite of the fact that the assessee company did not hold all the share capital of M/s. Ambernath Investments Pvt. Ltd.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top