SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 24

Y.B.BHATT, M.H.KADRI
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KETANBHAI BHAGVANDAS SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.M.PRACHCHHAK, P.V.NANAVATI

Y. B. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) at the instance of the Insurance Company challenging the judgement and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad, in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 662/95 dated 27/04/2001. This Court had issued notice for summary disposal in response to which learned counsel Mr. Prachchhak has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 1-original claimant, who was also the driver of the scooter in question. Other respondents are absent though served.

( 2 ) APPEAL admitted. Mr. Prachchhak waives service of notice in the appeal on behalf of the respondent no. 1-original claimant.

( 3 ) AS aforesaid, this is an appeal by the Insurance Company challenging the aforesaid award contending that the Insurance Company is not liable to satisfy the award on the ground that the second respondent, who was the driver of the offending vehicle insured by the appellant insurer, had violated one of the essential terms and conditions of the policy, inasmuch as he did not hold an effective driving licence on the date of the accident.

( 4 ) IN order to appreciate the contr
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top