SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 91

D.P.BUCH
AMRATBHAI LILABHAI DESAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.M.PANCHAL, K.G.SHETH, K.J.PANCHAL

D. P. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) ). This is a Revision Application filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code (for short "the Code"), challenging the judgment and order dated 7. 1. 2002 recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 10 in Criminal Appeal No. 15/1999 under which the learned Judge dismissed the said appeal and confirmed the judgment and conviction order dated 18. 1. 1999 recorded by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 10, Ahmedabad City, in Criminal Case No. 1806/1997 whereby the learned Magistrate convicted the present petitioner for the offences punishable under Section 279, 304-A of the I. P. C. as well as for the offences punishable under Section 177 and 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act, and sentenced him to suffer S. I. for 3 months and fine of Rs. 500. 00 for the offence punishable under Section 279 of the I. P. C. The petitioner was directed to suffer further S. I. for 15 days in case the fine was not paid. For the offence punishable under Section 304-A of the I. P. C. the petitioner was sentenced to suffer S. I. for six months. He was directed to pay fine of Rs. 1,000. 00 and in case he did not pay the fine he was required t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top