SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 402

B.J.SHETHNA, N.G.NANDI
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDRAKUMAR PARSHOTTAMBHAI DESAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.B.TRIVEDI, K.G.VAKHARIA, M.J.THAKUR, S.B.VAKIL, S.N.THAKKAR, TUSHAR MEHTA

B. J. SHETHNA, J.

( 1 ) THE applicants-appellants State of Gujarat and Collector Vadodara have filed above appeal against the judgment and decree dated 21. 3. 1994 passed by the Joint Civil Judge (S. D.), Vadodara in Special Civil Suit No. 776/92 whereby the learned Judge dismissed the Special Civil Suit No. 776/92 filed by the appellants for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of land bearing survey No. 371 and 372b Tika No. 27/15, 27/16, 27/17 Survey No. 1/a/2 situated within the municipal limits of Vadodara Municipal Corporation admeasuring 128073 sq. mtr. of land i. e. 53 vighas and 17 vassas. The appeal was admitted way back on 13. 5. 1994. It seems that the appeal was earlier listed for final hearing on 22. 6. 2000 before other Division Bench wherein Civil Application No. 4849 of 2000 was moved on the previous day i. e. on 22. 6. 2000 and it was placed before the concerned Bench on 22. 6. 2000 under the orders of the Honble Chief Justice. The said application was filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of Civil Procedure Code seeking permission to adduce additional evidence in the First Appeal. However, the said Civil Application No. 4849 of 2000 for production of additional
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top