SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 419

K.R.VYAS, RAVI R.TRIPATHI
MAHESH LAXMANBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.T.DAVE, MEHUL SHARAD SHAH, Rajesh M.Agrawal

K. R. VYAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order dated 8/03/1999 passed by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 15, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No. 208 of 1998, by which the appellant is convicted under Sections 8 (C) and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (`the NDPS Act for short) and punished with R. I. for 10 years and a fine of Rs. 1 lac (Rupees One lac Only), in default to undergo R. I. for six months.

( 2 ) THE name of Mr. Mehul S. Shah was notified as the learned Advocate for the appellant, Mr. Shah produced a letter dated 16th March, 2002 addressed to the appellant, seeking his instructions as to whether he has to conduct the matter or the appellant wants to engage another advocate. Mr. Shah has also produced a xerox copy of a post card dated 25th March, 2002 addressed to him by the appellant. Mr. Shah submitted that as indicated in that post card, he has already handed over the papers to Mr. R. M. Agrawal, who may be permitted to address the Court. Both the letters are taken on record and Mr. Agrawal is permitted to make his submissions on behal




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top