SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 800

A.L.DAVE
MAVJIBHAI KARSANBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.D.DESAI, B.K.Dave, E.E.SAIYED, P.J.Kanabar, P.S.GOGIA

A. L. DAVE, J.

( 1 ) ). THIS Criminal Revision Application is preferred by accused facing criminal trial before the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 10, Ahmedabad, in Sessions Case No. 162 of 1997. The petitioners in Misc. Criminal Revision Application No. 2696 of 2000 are co-accused to the present revisioners. The revisioners are aggrieved by an order passed by learned Additional City Sessions judge, Court No. 10, on the 18/05/2000, allowing application Ex. 13 before him in the said Sessions Case, praying for a direction for further investigation under Section 173 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the investigating agency. The said application, Ex. 13, was tendered by learned Additional Public Prosecutor, stating that deceased-Riddhiben Nareshbhai Patel was taken to Civil Hospital by Bharatbhai Karsanbhai Patel, where history was given that her mother sustained electric current while heating water with electric heater for bathing. However, the Panchnama of the place of incident is indicative of the fact that the deceased died of kerosene burns and not electric current. It is not the case that the fire started because of short circuit in the current and, ther












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top