SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 84

K.A.PUJ
MAFATBHAI P. BHOI (SINCE DECD. ) THROUGH HIS HEIRS – Appellant
Versus
PATEL PIYUSHBHAI SOMABHAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, JITENDRA M.PATEL

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners, in this petition, have challenged the order passed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal on 31-3-1992 in Revision Application No. TEN. B. A. 421 of 1991 confirming the order passed by the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms (Appeal), Kheda, who in turn had confirmed the order passed by the Mamlatdar and Agricultural Land Tribunal, Anand on 20th July, 1983 in Tenancy Case No. 485/6/82. The petitioners have made the prayer for quashing and setting aside of all these 3 orders.

( 2 ) IT is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners have made an application under Sec. 32pp of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act (hereinafter referred. to as "the Act") before the Mamlatdar and A. L. T. , Anand, in respect of the land bearing Survey No. 99/4, admeasuring about 1 Acre and 17 Gunthas of Village-Karamsar, Taluka-Anand, District-Kaira. The said application was registered as the Tenancy Case No. 482/c/82. The petitioners have, inter alia, contended in the said application that deceased Mathurbhai Dhulabhai Bhoi, their predecessor-in-title, was cultivating the said land on 1-4-1957 and that the petitioners were the heirs and legal representatives of the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top