SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 141

D.P.BUCH
RAGHUBHAI SURABHAI BHARWAD – Appellant
Versus
SATISHKUMAR RANCHHODDAS PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.PANDEY, J.M.PANCHAL, P.K.JANIKIRAN, S.J.DAVE

D. P. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner abovenamed has filed the present Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in order to challenge the judgment and order dated 19-6-1995 recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) at Mirzapur in Criminal Appeal no. 16/1994 confirming the judgment and conviction order dated 6-6-1994 recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ahmedabad (Rural) at Mirzapur in Criminal Case no. 47/1992 under which the learned Magistrate had convicted the present petitioner for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced him to suffer S. I. for six months and to pay fine of Rs. 25,000. 00, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo S. I. for three months and also to pay compensation of Rs. 22,000. 00.

( 2 ) THE first respondent had filed the aforesaid criminal case before the aforesaid Court stating that the petitioner was required to pay an amount of Rs. 23,000/to the first respondent and with a view to satisfy the said due, the petitioner had issued a cheque of Rs. 22,000/dated 5-12-1991. Further details are

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top