SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 193

A.L.DAVE, B.J.SHETHNA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DEENANJI GIDHAJI THAKORE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.A.ADESHARA, V.M.PANCHOLI

B. J. SHETHNA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant-State of Gujarat, by this Letters Patent Appeal, has challenged the judgment and order dated 9th April, 2002, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court (Coram: D. H. Waghela, J.) in Special Civil Application No. 8913 of 2001.

( 2 ) THE respondent-workman was working in the Irrigation Department of the State of Gujarat as Chowkidar, on daily wage basis. His services were terminated on 15. 2. 1999, on the ground that no work was available. He, therefore, raised an industrial dispute which, ultimately, was referred to the Labour Court, Kalol, registered as Reference (LCK) No. 330 of 1999. The Labour Court, by its award dated 15. 9. 2000, set aside the order of termination of the respondent-workman and ordered to reinstate the workman in service with all other benefits, except back wages. 2. 1 the aforesaid award passed by the Labour Court was challenged by the appellant-State of Gujarat before this Court by way of Special Civil Application No. 8913 of 2001. Before the learned Single Judge of this Court, a specific contention was raised that the workman was working in the Irrigation Department of the State of Gujarat, which is not an "industr











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top