SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 264

D.P.BUCH, H.H.MEHTA
ABDUL SALAM YUSUF SHEIKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.S.SUPEHIA, K.C.SHAH

H. H. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE original accused - Abdul Salam Yusufbhai Shaikh of N. D. P. S. Case No. 8/96 tried and decided by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Valsad at Navsari (who will be referred to as the learned Judge of the trial court) has, by preferring this appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short cr. p. c. ) read with Section 36-B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the ndps Act) challenged the correctness, legality, validity and propriety of judgment Exh. 42 rendered on 30th December, 1998, in aforesaid NDPS Case No. 8/96 by the learned Judge of the trial Court by which said accused came to be convicted under Section 235 (2) of Cr. p. c. for offence punishable under Section 22 of the NDPS Act and he sentenced to undergo R. I. for 12 years and to pay a fine of Rupees One lakh, and in default of fine to undergo further imprisonment for one year.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to this present appeal in a nutshell can be summarised as follows:2. 1 on 15. 2. 96, P. W. 4 Mr. Prakash Mahendrabhai Jadav was serving as Police Inspector in State Narcotics Cell, CID Crime, Gujarat State, Ahmedabad. Mr. Jadav, in






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top