SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 333

M.S.SHAH, N.G.NANDI
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
MANJULABEN JAYANTIBHAI PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.K.NAYAR, T.M.HAKIM

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) SINCE both these appeals as well as the civil applications involve common question of law about maintainability of the appeals filed by the Insurance Company under Section 173 read with Sections 149 and 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which preliminary contention is raised in the above numbered civil applications, the appeals as well as the civil applications are heard together and are being decided by this common order.

( 2 ) A motor vehicle accident took place on 9. 6. 1992 involving a tanker and a Maruti car resulting into the death of Jayantibhai, a passenger in the car, and injuries to Sanjay Ramanlal, driver of the car. The widow and minor children of Jayantibhai filed MACP No. 911 of 1992 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") claiming compensation to the tune of Rs. 50 lacs. Sanjay Ramanbhai- driver of the car filed MACP No. 1055 of 1992 under the same provision claiming compensation of Rs. 3 lacs. Both the claim petitions were filed only against the driver, owner and Insurance Company of the tanker. The driver and owner of the tanker, though served, did not appear before the Tribunal but the Insuran















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top