SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 609

D.P.BUCH
PRAJAPATI OIL INDUSTRY THRO ITS OWNEER RAMESHBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: F.B.BRAHMBHATT, M.B.GANDHI, S.S.PATEL, Sunil M.Agrawal

D. P. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner above named has preferred this Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("the Code" for short ) challenging the judgment and conviction order September 30, 2002, recorded by the learned Addl. City Sessions Judge, Court No. 16, Ahmedabad in Criminal appeal No. 3 of 2002, under which the learned Addl. Sessions Judge dismissed the said appeal of the petitioner and confirmed the judgment and conviction order dated 27/12/2001, recorded by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 10, Ahmedabad City in Criminal Case No. 1689 of 1998 under which the learned Metropolitan Magistrate convicted the present petitioner for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("the Act" for short) and sentenced him to suffer SI for one year and directing him to pay fine of Rs. 5,000. 00 and in default of payment of fine, the petitioner was directed to undergo further SI for three months.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case of the complainant before the trial Court may be briefly stated as follows :according to the case of the second respondent, the second respondent has



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top