Gujarat High Court
Judgename :D.P.Buch
SHAUKATHUSAIN CHANDA - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION 2965 of 1995
Decided On : 11/15/2003
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 –Criminal Revision Application is filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 in order to challenge a judgement and conviction order recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahal at Godhra in Sessions Case No. 83/1993, under which the learned Judge convicted the present petitioner for an offence punishable under Section 332 of I. P. C. whereunder the petitioner was sentenced to suffer R. I. for six months. Court was also directed to pay fine of Rs. 1,000. 00 and in default of payment of fine Court was required to undergo further R. I. for one month –Facts of the case of the prosecution before the Trial Court may be briefly stated –Original informant-Shankarbhai Patel working as Assistant Conservator of Forest was on his duty in a mobile squad said informant was on patrolling duty along with his police guards supplied by the Forest Department to him. When court was on his way to the said patrolling duty, Court had gone to village Bhagidol then he proceeded on the way to Godhra – Informant and the petitioner both were injured and therefore, the tractor was allowed to be there and the remaining person went to Vejalpur in the said jeep car of the informant –Held, BHURABHAI Hirabhai, Exh. 28, is also an armed constable, who had accompanied the informant at relevant point of time. He has also given evidence about the entire episode and court has further deposed before the trial Court that the informant had received a razor injury on his abdomen and the person causing injury had also sustained gun shot wound and, therefore, the informant as well as the person receiving gun shot injury both were carried in the same jeep car to Vejalpur and then they were carried to the Civil Hospital at Godhra. It is further deposed by him that the person, who had sustained injury was a person, who had injury on his thigh there is complete evidence on record to show that the petitioner had caused injury to the informant –NOW, one thing is clear that the informant was an officer in the Forest Department and as such, court was a Government officer and therefore it is clear that the petitioner has caused injury to the informant when he was on his duty as a public servan –Petition is disposed.
( 1 ) THIS Criminal Revision Application is filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 in order to challenge a judgement and conviction order recorded on 8-11-1995 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahal at Godhra in Sessions Case No. 83/1993, under which the learned Judge convicted the present petitioner for an offence punishable under Section 332 of I. P. C. whereunder the petitioner was sentenced to suffer R. I. for six months. He was also directed to pay fine of Rs. 1,000. 00 and in default of payment of fine he was required to undergo further R. I. for one month.
( 2 ) THE facts of the case of the prosecution before the Trial Court may be briefly stated as follows :
( 3 ) ON 18-4-1990 at about 4 p. m. the original informant-Shankarbhai Patel working as Assistant Conservator of Forest was on his duty in a mobile squad. The said informant was on patrolling duty along with his police guards supplied by the Forest Department to him. When he was on his way to the said patrolling duty, he had gone to village Bhagidol then he proceeded on the way to Godhra. After crossing a passage of about 1 k. m. he stopped at a place with a view to check the vehicles coming and going thereby. After about 15 minutes, he found one tractor No. GJU 6456 with a trailor coming from village Bhagidol and proceeding towards Godhra, woods of Mahuda trees and branches were found loaded in the trailor of the said tractor. Four labourers were also sitting in the said trailor. The informant and the police personnel stopped the said tractor. At that time, three of the four labourers had run away. The said tractor was followed by a motor cycle, two persons were travelling on the said motor cycle. When they saw that the tractor was stopped by the informant, they took a turn and ran away towards Godhra. An inquiry was made from the driver of the tractor and there it was learnt that the said two persons running away on the motor cycle were the persons being the owners or occupants of the tractor. A further inquiry was made with respect to their names and addresses from the driver and the said labourers but they did not supply the said information to the informant. Then, inquiry was made from the driver of the tractor about the pass or permit for carrying the said woods but the driver of the tractor did not possess the same and therefore, the driver was directed to take the said tractor to Vejalpur Forest Depot, through village Bhagidol. Two police constables were directed to sit by the side of the driver of the tractor (so that the driver may not run away) and the labourer was required to sit in the jeep car of the informant. The tractor was required to go ahead and was followed by the jeep-car of the informant.
( 4 ) WHEN they reached near the board of village Bhalania, a motor cycle was found going with three persons travelling thereon. It overtook the jeep car and the tractor and stopped ahead of the said tractor. One of them had an instrument like razor with him and another person had stick with him and the said three persons went towards the tractor. There had some scuffle with the police personnel and out of those three persons, the person having a stick had inflicted a stick blow on the rifle of police constable Bhurabhai on account of which the butt of the rifle was broken. Therefore, the informant came out of jeep car and went towards the tractor. At that time, the person having a razor like weapon committed an assault on him by means of the said razor and an injury was caused on the left side of the abdomen of the informant. The said person attempted to cause a second injury to the informant but the informant caught hold of his hand and, therefore, there was some injury on the right hand of the informant. In the meantime, two police constables, with a view to save the life of the informant, fired two gun shots in air and yet the said person did not leave the informant. The informant was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.