SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 102

J.N.BHATT
JOSHI TUSHAR TANSUKHBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, KAMAL B.TRIVEDI, SANGITA K.VISHEN, SEJAL SUTARIYA, V.H.DESAI, Y.N.OZA

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THE main theme and the hub of the entire petition is referable to judicial scrutiny, determination and adjudication of an alleged disparity in the pay-scales of two classes of teaching and non-teaching persons employed in Private Secondary and Higher Secondary Schools aided by the Government in the State of Gujarat challenging the scheme evolved and designed on the basis of grant-in-aid policy for Private Schools and emanated from the Government Resolution dated 02-07-1999. By virtue of the impugned scheme under the Resolution dated 02-07-1999 of the State Government, the appellants (hereinafter referred to as "original-petitioners") have been in employment in various Private Aided Secondary and Higher Secondary Schools as Shikshan Sahayaks (Education Assistants), Vahivati Sahayaks (Administrative Assistants) and Sathi Sahayaks (Co-assistants) and the entire linchpin of the petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is challenged against scheme only for parity in pay-scales with other employees, who, according to them, are similarly situated and, therefore, they have pressed into service the doctrine of `equal Pay for Equal Work.

( 2 ) IT is thei


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top