SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 239

BHAWANI SINGH, H.K.RATHOD
YAMINI J. DAVE – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR, I. U. C. A. A. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: SANGITA N.PAHVA, V.P.Chaudhary

H. K. RATHOD, J.

( 1 ) IN this Letters Patent Appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment passed by Single Judge (Coram: M. S. Shah, J.) in Special Civil Application No. 11047 of 1994 dated January 10, 1996, whereby, the petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the present Letters Patent Appeal may be narrated thus. The appellant was appointed clerk-cum-typist by the respondents vide appointment Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? letter dated September 9, 1991, pursuant to advertisement dated May 11, 1991, in INFLIBNET programme with IUCAA, an autonomous registered society established by the University Grants Commission with head quarter at Ahmedabad. The candidates appointed to the posts advertised were to remain on probation for a period of one year from the date of appointment and subject to service conditions and conduct rules approved by the governing body of the INFLIBNET/ IUCAA. The appellant joined the post of clerk-cum-typist on September 11, 1991 with pay scale of Rs. 950-1500. By Office Order dated September 15, 1992, the appellant was informed that her probationary period stood closed fro



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top