SUJATA V.MANOHAR, D.P.WADHWA
Wasim Beg – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
Judgment
Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-Leave granted.
2. The appellant was appointed as Assistant Manager in the respondent-U.P. State Leather Development and Marketing Corporation on 22.11.1974.
3. On 10th of January, 1978 the appellant was selected and appointed as Divisional Manager in the respondent-Corporation. The letter of appointment which is dated 10th of January, 1978 states as follows:-
“...............
His appointment will be on probation for a period of one year which can be extended at the discretion of the Managing Director. His services are liable to be terminated on one month’s notice or salary in lieu thereof. He will be governed by the Service Rules of the Corporation........”
4. The appellant continued to work as Divisional Manager of the respondent-Corporation till 21st of April, 1981 when he was re-designated as Works Manager. He continued thereafter in the said post. In April 1983 he was allowed to cross the Efficiency Bar.
5. It is the contention of the respondent that initially the work of the appellant was good but subsequently his work and performance deteriorated as a result of which the Corporation had to suffer losses. The appellant was given several warning
Dayaram Dayal v. State of M.P. & Anr.
State of Gujarat v. Akhilesh C. Bhargav & Ors.
Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Municipal Corporation, Raipur v. Ashok Kumar Misra
Satya Narayan Athya v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
Shri Kedar Nath Bahl v. The State of Punjab & Ors.
Dhanjibhai Ramjibhai v. State of Gujarat
Tarsem Lal Verma v. Union of India & Ors.
State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh Khosla
State of Punjab v. Dharam Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.