SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 321

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, D.P.WADHWA
Wasim Beg – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-Leave granted.

2. The appellant was appointed as Assistant Manager in the respondent-U.P. State Leather Development and Marketing Corporation on 22.11.1974.

3. On 10th of January, 1978 the appellant was selected and appointed as Divisional Manager in the respondent-Corporation. The letter of appointment which is dated 10th of January, 1978 states as follows:-

“...............

His appointment will be on probation for a period of one year which can be extended at the discretion of the Managing Director. His serv­ices are liable to be terminated on one month’s notice or salary in lieu thereof. He will be governed by the Service Rules of the Corpora­tion........”

4. The appellant continued to work as Divisional Manager of the re­spondent-Corporation till 21st of April, 1981 when he was re-designated as Works Manager. He continued thereafter in the said post. In April 1983 he was allowed to cross the Efficiency Bar.

5. It is the contention of the respondent that initially the work of the appellant was good but subsequently his work and performance deteriorated as a result of which the Corporation had to suffer loss­es. The appellant was given several warning







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top