( 1 ) PETITIONERS were serving in the Security Force, a branch in the Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Limited (IPCL) Baroda, till 1972. Sometime during this year, director General, Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), proposed to Management of IPCL that policy of the central Government required security of CISF to protect whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? the Industries of the Government. Therefore, Security force maintained by IPCL was sought to be inducted into cisf. When this proposal was conveyed to the employees of Security Force of IPCL, which included the petitioners and some other employees, induction was protested since it would cause injustice and inconvenience to the petitioners. It was stated that induction into CISF would mean transfer anywhere in India, which was neither conducive nor in the interest of the petitioners. Moreover, they had been engaged in Security Force of IPCL since they had lost their agricultural lands for the formation of IPCL Complex, and they belong to villages surrounding IPCL, meaning thereby, they were not prepared for the induction since it may result in transfers