BHAWANI SINGH, H.K.RATHOD
LEGAL HEIRS and REPRESENTATIVE OF DECD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) BEFORE adverting to the facts of the matters at hand, it would be proper to refer to few observations made by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court in Mangalore Ganesh Beedi Works and others and Mangalore Ganesh Beedi Workers and Allied Beedi Factories Workers Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? YES Association, Akbar Road Mandi Mohalla, Mysore [2004 (103) FLR 387] since the same are material in view of the facts of the present case. "the judicial review power vested in this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India should be exercised in such a way as to advance the objectives of law and not to thwart those objective. Technicalities cannot be permitted to hijack the divine rhythm of justice. The parties should win or lose on substantive grounds and not on technical tortures. The relief to be granted by the High Court must be such as could be considered permissible in law and worked out by application of legally recognized principles. The decision must have legitimacy of legal reasoning and should not incur the criticism of lacking the objectivity of purpose and rational and legal justi
A.Adinarayana V. State Of Andhra Pradesh
K.B.Mfg.Co. V. Sales Tax Commissioner
Bharat Board Mills Ltd. Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Gujarat University Vs Sonal P.Shah
Mohatta Bros. Vs Chaturbhaidas Chimanlal
Dahiben W/O Karsanbhai Raghabhai Vs Jesingbhai Bijalbhai
Matuben Sundarji Sejpal Vs Anantbhai Tekchand
Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti Vs Bhupinder Kaur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.