SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 197

AKIL KURESHI
KISHORCHANDRA GANDULAL PETHANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - THRO. ARJUNSINGH - IAS OR HIS SUCCESSOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.M.MANGUKIYA, S.P.HASURKAR

AKIL KURESHI, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Learned AGP Mr. Hasurkar waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents. At the joint request of the learned advocates appearing for the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal today.

( 2 ) IN the present petition, the petitioner has complained about his non-promotion by the Government from the post of Legal Superintendent (Junior Duty) Class-II in the pay-scale of Rs. 6500-10500 to the next promotional post of Legal Superintendent (Senior Duty) Class-II in the scale of Rs. 8000-13500.

( 3 ) THE short facts leading to the present petition are that the petitioner who is working with the Government as Legal Superintendent (Junior Duty) Class-II was due for consideration for his promotion to the next higher post of Legal Superintendent (Senior Duty) Class-II. On availability of vacancy, meeting of the Departmental Promotion Committee was held on June 18, 2003. It is the case of the petitioner, with which there is no serious dispute raised by the respondents, that the DPC considered the case of the petitioner for promotion and he was also placed in the select list. It is also the case of the petitioner that as required under the R













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top