SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 230

AKIL KURESHI
B. J. JADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: L.R.PUJARI, Paresh Upadhyay, S.P.HASURKAR

AKIL KURESHI, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition, the main issue that is required to be considered is whether the Disciplinary Authority can rely upon the advice rendered by the Gujarat Public service Commission (hereinafter to be referred to as "gpsc" for short) without supplying a copy thereof to the delinquent Government servant.

( 2 ) FACTS leading to the present petition are as follows:2. 1 the petitioner was initially appointed as district Inspector, Land Records Class-II as a direct recruit on 16. 8. 79 under the administrative control of the Settlement Commissioner and Director of Land Records, gujarat State. In the year 1990, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Superintendent of Land Records (Class I ). While holding the said post, a chargesheet came to be issued against the petitioner on 11. 11. 02. In the said chargesheet, there were three charges levelled against the petitioner. First charge levelled against the petitioner was that on different occasions, the petitioner had committed serious irregularities and had tampered with the record in the results of the candidates in the departmental examinations held in May 1993 and november 1993 when the petitioner was working as























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top