SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 369

K.A.PUJ
ANKIL MEMBERS ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYSINH JADEJA, (LIQUIDATOR) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: JITENDRA MALKAN, K.S.Nanavati, KEYUR GANDHI

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) THE point involved in all these four applications is similar one and hence, all these four applications are being disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the facts are taken from Company Application No. 197 of 2004. Except the change in the name of the companies in each of these four applications, there is no other change and applicants are same as well as Liquidator appointed for all the four companies is also same.

( 2 ) THE applicants have taken out Judges Summons in all these four applications requesting this Court to issue appropriate order, direction under the provisions of Section 518 of the Companies Act, 1956 for revival of the Companies in liquidation, in view of unanimous Resolutions dated 20. 04. 2004 passed by all the Shareholders / Contributories i. e. the applicants herein and the Creditors of the Companies for their revival, in the interest of justice and equity.

( 3 ) AN affidavit in support of the Judges Summons taken out in Company Application No. 197 of 2004 is filed by Shri Parshottambhai Patel, an authorised representative of the applicants. It is stated therein that the applicants are the contributories / sharehold

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top