H.K.RATHOD
VITHAL HARJIVANDAS PATEL – Appellant
Versus
SATYAM EDU. TRUST THRO MANAGING TRUSTEE – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD the learned Advocate, Mr. C. K. Pandya, appearing on behalf of petitioner.
( 2 ) IN these petitions, the petitioner has challenged the common order passed by Gujarat Secondary Education Tribunal, Ahmedabad dated 16. 8. 2004 in Application Nos. 527/1994, 471 of 1997 and 327 of 2001.
( 3 ) LEARNED Advocate, Mr. C. K. Pandya, submitted that petitioner was working as Junior Clerk with the respondent. Three separate applications were filed by petitioner before the Tribunal. Application No. 527 of 1994 was filed against the action of the Management promoting respondent No. 4 to the post of Senior Clerk by superseding the petitioner. Application No. 471 of 1997 is filed with a grievance that respondent School has once again prevented him from attending the duties and non-payment of salary. Application No. 327 of 2001 was filed challenging the order of dismissal. Since all the three applications were between the same parties and interconnected, therefore, the Tribunal has passed common order rejecting all the three applications by an order dated 16. 8. 2004.
( 4 ) THE order of Tribunal is dated 16. 8. 2004. The petitions are filed after a period of one year onl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.