SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 145

M.R.SHAH
Kokilaben – Appellant
Versus
Regional Passport Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.M.MALKAN, M.A.SHAIKH, Murali N.Devnani

M. R. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Shri J. M. Malkan, learned Asst. Solicitor General of India with Shri m. A. Shaikh, learned Additional Standing counsel for the Central Government waive service of rule on behalf of the respective 5 respondents in respective petition. 1. With the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, all these matters are taken up for final hearing today.

( 2 ) AS the common question of law and facts arise in this group of petitions, they are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

( 3 ) THE petitioners in respective petition are either already having passport issued by the respondent authority and/or they have applied for fresh passport. The respective petitioners have prayed for in the respective petition to direct the respondent passport authority to make necessary correction/s and/or the change/s in the passport with respect to either date of birth and/or place of birth as in the certificate issued by the competent authority under the provisions of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 as well as in the School Leaving Certificate issued by the School Authority there is discrepancy in the date of birth.

( 4 ) IT is the common contention and th
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top