SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 399

R.S.GARG, M.R.SHAH
SAURASHTRA CEMENT LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: JITENDRA MALKAN, Mihir Thakore, P.P.BANERJI

M. R. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of Section 274 (1) (g) of the Companies Act, 1956 as amended by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 with effect from December 13, 2000 [hereinafter referred to as the said act ]. The petitioners have also prayed for a declaration that the said provisions are ultra vires the Constitution of India more particularly Article 14 thereof.

( 2 ) THE petitioner No. 1 is a Company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act, 1956, and petitioner No. 2 is a shareholder of the petitioner No. 1 Company. Petitioner No. 1 Company is incurring losses and is unable to redeem debentures on due date, i. e. , 30th September 2003 (1st installment ). Considering the provision of Section 274 (1) (g) of the Act, the Directors of the petitioner company would stand disqualified for being appointed as Directors in another companies after 29th September 2004 and therefore the Company has preferred the present Special Civil Application challenging the vires of Section 274 (1) (g) of the Companies Act. Section 274 of the Companies Act reads as under;"s. 274. Disqualification of directors " (1) A person shall not be capable





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top