( 1 ) MR. S. S. Sanjanwala, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to delete respondent No. 3, who is reported as expired, on the ground that the matter before the State Government was contested only by the petitioners having purchased the land by registered sale deed after payment of the consideration to the original owner. Considering the facts and circumstances, leave granted.

( 2 ) IN view of the aforesaid order, the matter shall be essentially between the petitioners and the State Government having exercised the revisional jurisdiction against the order passed by the T. D. O. granting N. A. permission of the land in question.

( 3 ) THE short facts of the case appear to be that one Mahijibhai Somabhai was holding the land at village Maghasar, Taluka Halol, District Panchmahals applied for permission for non-agricultural use of the land to Taluka Panchayat, Halol on 15. 09. 1980. The Taluka Development Officer passed the order on 24/25. 11. 1980 granting permission for N. A. use of the land in question. One of the conditions No. 18 of the permission was to pay premium of Rs. 18,906/- to the District Collector, Panchmahals after obtaining permission from the Di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document