SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 600

H.K.RATHOD
LUBI ELECTRICALS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
A. T. PAINTER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.M.PATEL, L.B.DABHI, MUKUL SINHA, SUNIT SHAH, T.R.MISHRA

H. K. RATHOD, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned Advocate Mr. K. M. Patel for petitioners, Mr. Sunit Shah, learned Govt. Pleader for the State Authority. Learned Advocates Mr. Mukul Sinha as well as Mr. T. R. Mishra for respective Union.

( 2 ) BY filing Special Civil Application No. 150 of 2006, 151 of 2006 and 152 of 2006, petitioners namely Lubi Electricals Ltd. , Ahmedabad, Lubi Submersible Pump Ltd. And AP Motors (Hereinafter referred to as Sthe Management for short) have challenged the judgment given by the Officer appointed under the Minimum Wages Act and Judge, Labour Court No. 14 Ahmedabad dated 19. 12. 2005 in Minimum Wages Application No. 51/98, 52/98 and 53 of 1998 which were filed by the applicant Government Labour Officer under Section 20 (3) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Under the impugned judgment, the labour court and the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 has partly allowed said applications and directed the establishment to pay minimum wages prescribed under the Minimum Wages Act to all workmen working in the establishment within thirty days from the date of receipt of copy of said order.

( 3 ) AS per the case of the petitioners in these petitions, the wages and ot







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top