Gujarat High Court
Judgename :J.R.Vora
RUPSINGHBHAI PUNABHAI PATEL - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - Respondent
Criminal Appeal 808 Of 1987
Decided On : 09/02/2006
Criminal Act – Appeal is preferred against the judgment and order delivered by the Special Judge, of September, 1987, in Special Case No. 28 of 1986, convicting present appellant - accused for the offences punishable under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and also for the offence punishable under Section 5 to read with Section 5 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The present appellant for both the counts was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment of one year and to pay fine of Rs. 100, in default, to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one month prosecution against the appellant can briefly stated as under: one was summoned by Deputy Director Gujarat State in connection with pending ACB cases. Other Police Inspectors were also called from the State by the Deputy Director – Deputy Director informed that certain police personnel and RTO employees used to illegally obtain money from the Drivers of the motor vehicles plying on highway road surrounding respect was directed by Deputy Director, to lay a decoy trap – It appears that in pursuance of this special direction, a team was formed under the leadership of was assisted by Patel and other staff members of Anti Corruption Bureau Office of including Police Head Constable Police Head Constable a staff member of Anti Corruption Office To lay a decoy trap, this team reached government guest house known as Ashram at occupied Room about on the same day, an attempt was made to search independent to be utilized in the said decoy trap. found two persons, named as Patel and Shah, both residents of from bus stand of and after ascertaining their willingness, they were taken to were introduced to other members of raiding party – Held, Learned Counsels about the quantum of punishment, it is made clear that having regard to the objectives of enacting the Prevention of Anti Corruption Act, long lapse of time, only is not the ground for mitigating the sentence because this has now become a common phenomenon but at the same time i. e. Circumstances as pleaded by the learned Senior counsel must not lose sight of. This is a case of peculiar kind and of a particular facts. Under Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Anti Corruption Act, 1947 for adequate reasons, the Court is empowered to award lesser punishment than the minimum. The circumstances which the learned Senior Counsel pleaded are the circumstances, in my humble view, can be taken into consideration for reduction of sentence and also the object and the purpose of enactment of the Act must be kept in mind. Each such case stands on its own facts. The facts of this case cannot be made precedent for the other case. Even for the adequate grounds for reduction of sentence, in the matter of Administration as the Apex Court referring to the objects of the Prevention of Corruption Act and referring to the particular circumstances of that case, came to the conclusion that the ends of justice would meet if the fine imposed was raised to sentence of imprisonment was reduced to that already undergone from one and half years. Like in other decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Tar as reported in Apex Court while maintaining the conviction reduced the sentence to already undergone by the accused of Vishnu State of Maharashtra as reported in sentence came to be reduced to the period of imprisonment already undergone – Appeal is partly allowed.
( 1 ) THIS Appeal is preferred against the judgment and order delivered by the Special Judge, Ahmedabad, on 21st of September, 1987, in Special Case No. 28 of 1986, convicting present appellant - accused for the offences punishable under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and also for the offence punishable under Section 5 (1) (d) to read with Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The present appellant for both the counts was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment of one year and to pay fine of Rs. 100, in default, to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one month. For both the counts, one sentence i. e. fine and imprisonment is awarded by the Special Judge to the appellant - accused.
( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the prosecution against the appellant can briefly stated as under: one Mr. Maurya serving as P. I. ACB, Amreli, was summoned by Mr. Anilbhai Pandya, Deputy Director, ACB, Gujarat State on 18th of October, 1985 in connection with pending ACB cases. Other Police Inspectors were also called from the State by the Deputy Director. On that day, i. e. 18. 10. 1985, Deputy Director Mr. Pandya informed P. I. Mr. Maurya that certain police personnel and RTO employees used to illegally obtain money from the Drivers of the motor vehicles plying on highway road surrounding Ahmedabad City. In this respect, Mr. Maurya, was directed by Mr. Anilbhai Pandya , Deputy Director, to lay a decoy trap. It appears that in pursuance of this special direction, a team was formed under the leadership of Mr. Maurya and he was assisted by H. H. Saiyed, PSI, H. H. Patel and other staff members of Anti Corruption Bureau Office of Palanpur including Police Head Constable Harshadbhai Pandya, Police Head Constable Navalsinh, a staff member of Anti Corruption Office of Ahmedabad. To lay a decoy trap, this team reached government guest house known as Pathik Ashram at Gandhinagar at 7. 00 p. m. and occupied Room No. 39 on 18. 10. 1985. At about 10. 00 p. m. on the the same day, an attempt was made to search independent panchas to be utilized in the said decoy trap. Mr. Maurya found two persons, named as Ramubhai Jivabhai Patel and Sureshbhai Ratilal Shah, both residents of Kathwada, as panchas from bus stand of Gandhinagar and after ascertaining their willingness, they were taken to Pathik Ashram. The panchas were introduced to other members of raiding party. It was decided that they would first go towards Narol via Chhala and Naroda and inquire from the drivers of motor vehicles plying on road, and if any of them volunteered to accompany them for laying the decoy trap, then such driver would be utilized as punter. A preliminary panchnama was prepared in the presence of above two panchas at 11. 30 p. m. all of them in one police jeep started from Gandinagar and ultimately reached at Bhavada Three Roads at about 1. 30 a. m. on 19th of October, 1985, travelling through Chhala, Naroda, Odhav and Balasinor Road. They temporarily stayed near Bhavada Three Roads and waited for arrival for some vehicles. At about 1. 45 a. m. one truck loaded with logs of wood was found proceeding from Godhra to Ahmedabad. The said vehicle was stopped and driver was made to alight from the vehicle. It was found that the name of the driver was Siddiquebhai Ismailbhai, resident of Vejalpur, Godhra Taluka. He showed a pass issued from the Forest Department for transporting of logs of wood which were to be unloaded at Ahmedabad. The raiding party explained Siddiquebhai the purpose of their being at Bhavda Three Roads and asked Siddiquebhai whether he would be willing to be a decoy witness in the said trap. Driver Siddiquebhai expressed his willingness to assist and cooperate in the said decoy trap. Siddiquebhai thereafter along with panchas was taken inside jeep of ACB, and police Head Constable Navalsinh explained the utility of anthracene powder and ultra violet lamp. PI Mr. Maurya gave currency notes worth of Rs. 50/- to Police Head Cons
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.