SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 13

M.R.SHAH
M. T. EMERALD SKY – Appellant
Versus
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: GAURAV BANERJEE, JAYDEEP MAZUMDAR, NIRANJAN CHAKRABATTY, R.S.SANJANWALA

( 1 ) OJ Civil Application No. 140 of 2004 in Admirality Suit No. 5 of 1998 is filed by the applicants "original defendants to pass judgment and decree in terms of prayer (a) and (b) of the counterclaim contending inter alia that the defendants have filed their written statement and counterclaim on 11. 12. 2006 and inspite of 4 years having lapsed since the service of the counterclaim filed by the defendants, the plaintiffs have failed and neglected to file the written statement to the counterclaim and therefore, they have prayed for judgment and decree relying upon Order VIII Rule 5 r. w. Order VIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure; 1908 as according to the defendants - the applicants herein, the averments made in the counterclaim stands controverted.

( 2 ) OJ Civil Application No. 150 of 2005 in Admirality Suit No. 5 of 1998 is at the instance of the defendants to permit them to amend the written statement and counterclaim and cure other defects as detailed in Annexure " B and re-verify in terms of verification clause reproduced in Annexure " C. It is also further prayed to permit the defendants to place on record the written statement and counterclaim as amended and re-ver










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top