SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Guj) 456

K.A.PUJ
POPATJI BABAJI THAKOR – Appellant
Versus
MANUBHAI CHIMANLAL SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MR SHITAL R PATEL for Appellant
MR PRAKASH K JANI for Defendant

ORAL JUDGMENT

The appellants ori. defendants Nos.5 to 10 have filed this Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code challenging the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Mehsana on 15.3.2007 in Regular Civil Appeal No.87 of 2005 whereby the learned Additional District Judge, Mehsana has allowed the Appeal filed by the ori. plaintiff and passed a decree for specific performance in favour of the plaintiffs.

It is the case of the original defendants Nos.5 to 10 that the plaintiffs Nos.1 and 2 had filed a Suit for specific performance in respect of an agreement to sell allegedly executed by the defendants Nos.5 to 10 in favour of the ori. defendants Nos.1 to 4 and also asked for a specific performance in respect of an agreement to sell executed by original defendants Nos.1 to 4 in favour of the plaintiffs. Both the agreements were entered into in respect of the new tenure land and hence the specific performance of agreement to sell could not be granted in the eye of law.

It is also the case of the defendants Nos.5 to 10 that after hearing the parties, the trial Court has dismissed the suit of the plaintiffs and refused to pass decree fo















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top