SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Guj) 142

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.B.PARDIWALA
ELECTROHERM INDIA LTD – Appellant
Versus
ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr N.K. Pahwa for Mr Ashish H Shah for the Petitioner
None for Respondent(s): 1,

JUDGMENT

(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)

This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petition following reliefs:-

“(b) This Hon'ble Court will be pleased to issue writ of or in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside the impugned communication dated 22.11.2010 issued by the respondent-AR

(c) This Hon'ble Court will be pleased to issue writ of or in the nature of manda respondent-ARCIL to accept the tender bid of the petitioner-company and fur respondent-ARCIL to confirm the sale in favour of the petitioner-company in respect of the assets of M/s Mardia Steel Ltd.

(d) This Hon'ble Court will be pleased to issue writ of or in the nature of mandamus qu aside the action of the respondent-ARCIL in cancelling the auction,

(e) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Honourable Court direct the respondent-ARCIL to maintain status quo regarding the properties Mardia Steel Ltd. put to auction sale vide public notice dated 27.09.2010;

(f) That ex-parte ad interim relief in terms of the above prayer cla









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top