SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Guj) 340

J.B.PARDIWALA
Dharmendrabhai Nandubhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
H.L.Patel, J.K.Shah

Judgment

( 1. ) RULE returnable forthwith. Mr.J.K.Shah, learned APP for the State waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent State.

( 2. ) THIS is an Application under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure preferred by the accused-applicant, praying for suspension of the substantive order of sentence imposed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sabarkantha at Himmatnagar (camp at Idar), dated 21st May 2011 passed in Sessions Case No.159/2007, whereby the Additional District and Sessions Judge convicted the accused-applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 397, 395, 342, 506(2) read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

The trial Court, while convicting the accused-applicant for the offences punishable –

(a) under Section 395 IPC, has ordered the accused-applicant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of 7 years with fine of Rs.5,000=00 and in default of payment of fine, further simple imprisonment of one year.

(b) under Section 397 IPC, has ordered the accused applicant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of 7 years.

(c) under Section 342 IPC, has ordered the accused applicant to undergo rigorous imprisonment fo












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top