SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Guj) 86

T.U.MEHTA
NAJABHAI RANCHHOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORDER

This is a reference made by the Sessions Judge, Rajkot in Cri. Revn. Application No. 39/71 of his file wherein he has recommended that the order made by the Court of J.M.F.C., Rajkot, in Criminal Case No. 483/70 of his file compelling the accused-petitioner to get himself medically examined in order to determine the age of the defect in the vision of one of his eyes should be set aside. The learned Sessions Judge is of the opinion that the Criminal Procedure Code contains no provisions under which an accused person can be ordered to submit to medical examination which is likely to enable the prosecution to obtain incriminating evidence against him.

2. It is an admitted position that the petitioner No. 1 Najabhai Ranchhod, who is the accused No. 1 before the learned Magistrate, is prosecuted for the offence under Section 419 read with Section 34 I.P.C. on the allegation that with a view to obtain a driving licence from the Regional Transport Office, he requested the accused No. 2, Gandalal Vashram, to appear before the Regional Transport Officer under pretext that he was himself Najabhai Ranchhod. The allegation of the prosecution is that the petitioner did so as he apprehende











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top