V.B.RAJU, A.R.BAKSHI
Lalu Jela – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
RAJU, J. : This Criminal Appeal No. 395 of 1961 is filed by five persons, who were original accused Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 25 in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1961 tried by the Sessions Judge, PanchMahals. The learned Sessions Judge convicted the five appellants and hence this appeal. The appeal is before us for admission.
2. Under Section 410, Criminal Procedure Code, any person convicted on a trial by a Sessions Judge, or an Additional Sessions Judge; may appeal to the High Court. Section 419; Cri. Pro. Code provides that every appeal shall be made in the form of a petition in writing presented by the appellant or his pleader. The cumulative effect of Sections 410 and 419, Cri. Pro. Code is that every appellant should file a separate appeal in the form of a petition. If four persons P, Q, R and S are convicted on a trial held by a Sessions Judge, Section 410, Cri. P.C. provides that every one of these persons namely P or Q or R or S may appeal to the High Court and Sec. 419 provides that every appeal shall be made in the form of a petition in writing presented by the appellant or his pleader. On a reasonable interpretation of these two sections, every convicted person must file a s
AIR 1960 SC 936 (V 47) : 1960-3 SCR 578
AIR 1960 SC 1118 (V 47) : 1960-3 SCR 975
AIR 1935 PC 89 (V 22) : 36 Cri LJ 838
AIR 1955 Bom 113 (V 42) : 1955 Cri LJ 423
AIR 1951 Cal 10 (V 38) : 54 Cal WN 544 (FB)
AIR 1951 Cal 48 (V 38) : 55 Cal WN 385 (FB)
AIR 1951 Cal 69 (V 38) : 32 Cri LJ 723 (FB)
AIR 1951 Cal 101 (V 38) : 52 Cri LJ 946 (FB)
AIR 1951 Cal 133 (V 38) : 52 Cri LJ 1226 (FB)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.