RAVI R.TRIPATHI, A.G.URAIZEE
L. M. Makwana – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Gujarat – Respondent
PER: MR. A. G. URAIZEE, J.:-
1. The petitioner a Judicial Officer in the subordinate judiciary of Gujarat is before us under Articles 14, 16 and 226 of the Constitution of India to challenge the final decision dated 4th/14th September 2009 of the High Court and the Notification dated 1st December 2009 of the State of Gujarat in Legal Department whereby he came to be dismissed from the service upon o recommendation of the High Court. The petitioner has made the following prayers in the petition :-
"(A) Quashing and setting aside the final decision dated 4/14.9.2009 of the High Court and the notification dt. 1.12.2009 of the State Government and to reinstate the petitioner in service with all the consequential benefits including full back wages with 10% interest.
(8) During the pendency and final disposal, the Respondent No.2 may be directed to reinstate the petitioner in service.
(C) To grant such and further relief as may be deemed fit and proper."
2. The facts of the present case are that the petitioner, who was working as yd Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Vadodara for the period from 10.6.1996 to 25.4.1997. One Advocate, Mr Vijay Majmudar made a complaint on 7th July 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.