K.M.THAKER, G.B.SHAH
Ghaghal Ranchhodbhai Amarabhai – Appellant
Versus
Bhanjibhai Devshibhai Luhar – Respondent
G.B. SHAH, J.
1. So far as Civil Application No. 4700 of 2012 is concerned, Rule. Mr. Mehul S. Shah waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1.
1.1 We have heard Mr. P.C. Kavina, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. D.C. Sejpal, learned Advocate appearing for the applicant-third party and Mr. Mehul S. Shah, learned advocate for the respondent No. 1. Though duly served, none has appeared for respondent Nos. 2 to 5. On request made by learned senior advocate and learned advocates who were present before the Court, we have heard them by way of final hearing.
2. The applicant-third party seeks below mentioned relief in the present application:
“9 (a) Condone delay of 295 days caused in filing the application for joining applicant as party and for application for review of the order and judgment in LPA No. 2339 of 2009.”
Civil application No. 4700 of 2012 has been filed by the applicant-third party to condone the delay of 295 days caused in filing the review application against the order dated 10.5.2011 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 2339 of 2009 which was filed against the judgment dated 17.11.2009 delivered in Special Civil Application No. 11825 of 2009.
2.1
Gangadhara Palo vs. Revenue Divisional Officer and Another
Bakshi Dev Raj and Another vs. Sudheer Kumar
A. Nawab John and Others vs. V.N. Subramaniyam
Pohla Singh Alias Pohla Ram (D) by LRs. and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others
Shivdeo Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others
Meghmala and Others vs. G. Narasimha Reddy and Others
Gopabandhu Biswal vs. Krishna Chandra Mohanty and Others
Sanjay Verma vs. Manik Roy and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.