J.B.PARDIWALA
Lalitbhai Vikramchand Parekh – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. Since the prayer in all the three captioned applications is to quash a selfsame charge-sheet, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. The suicide is final: Once you take your life, that's it. You have only one life. End it - and you are done. You will never, ever get a second chance. The one who keeps you strong when nobody else does. The one who stands by you when everyone walks out. Imagine the pain, the sadness, the grief they would feel when you are gone. Even if you don't think, you have a special person worth living for, you do. You just don't know it yet.
3. By these three applications, the applicants-accused, seek to invoke the inherent powers of this Court, praying for quashing of the charge-sheet filed by the Investigating Officer, against them for the offence punishable under Sections 306, 506 and 115read with section 114 of the IPC, arising from a First Information Report, being C.R No. I-102/13, registered with the “A” Division Rajkot City Police Station, Rajkot.
4. The case of the prosecution may be summarized as under:-
4.1 The applicants herein are all members of a residential society, run
State of West Bengal v. Orilal Jaiswal
Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Randhir Singh v. State of Punjab
Gcngula Mohan Reddy v. State of A.P.
Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh.
Sanju alias Sanjay v. State of M.P.
M. Mohan v. State Represented the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandrajirao Angre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.