SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 193

V.M.PANCHOLI
Balkrishan Gopiram Goenka – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:Wadiaghandy & Co., Advocate
For Respondents/Defendant: H.B. Punani, APP

JUDGMENT :

V.M. Pancholi, J.

1. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code), wherein, the petitioner has prayed that Record & Proceedings of FIR being RC-20(A)/2008 - GNR, be called from the Court of learned Special Judge, CBI, Court No. 3, Mirzapur, Ahmedabad and after perusing the same, quash and set aside the said FIR and all proceedings initiated pursuant thereto.

2. Heard learned Senior Counsel Mr. Prakash M. Thakkar with learned advocate Mr. Tanvish Bhatt, learned advocate Mr. Jay Kansara and Ms. Gargi Vyas for Wadia Ghandy & Co. for petitioner and learned advocate Shri R.C. Kodekar for respondent No. 2 - C.B.I. and learned APP Ms. Punani for respondent No. 1 - State of Gujarat.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR being RC-20(A)/2008 - GNR came to be registered before Gandhinagar CBI, ACB for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 15 of the Preventio





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top